Velocity CMMC is the dedicated CMMC practice of Velocity Technologies for defense contractors nationwide.
(602) 425-5630
Manual decision-guide request

GCC High vs Enclave Decision Guide

Use this request page when cloud architecture, CUI containment, and Microsoft tenant decisions should follow scope instead of vendor shorthand.

Who it is for

Contractors deciding whether CUI should move into GCC High, a separate enclave, a segmented workflow, or another architecture path after scoping is understood.

What is inside

  • CUI workflow questions that should drive cloud and enclave decisions.
  • FedRAMP and external-provider prompts to review before architecture commitments.
  • Decision criteria for contained tenant, enclave, and segmented workflow options.
  • Evidence and administration questions that affect long-term maintainability.

Preview

A representative decision structure for choosing architecture based on CUI movement and operations.

Scope

CUI flow first

Map where controlled information is stored, processed, transmitted, shared, and administered.

Cloud

Provider baseline

Identify which cloud services touch CUI and what evidence is needed for each service relationship.

Enclave

Containment option

Evaluate whether a smaller enclave reduces scope without creating unsustainable operations.

Evidence

Administration model

Clarify owners, access paths, logging, configuration, and evidence refresh before migration work starts.

Related article

Do We Need GCC High?

Read why GCC High is not automatic and why the right answer depends on scope.

Explore the CMMC Consulting Hub, browse the template index, open the tools hub, or review the consulting path.